Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agent Determination function module

[Mark Pyc]

Don't know if this originally made it before or not. It was returned to=
 me
as a double send. Things have been behaving a bit strangely since I
subscribed under this account... apologies if this now really is a doub=
le
send.
 
 
----- Message from "Mark Pyc" <mark_pyc at gillette.com> on Thu, 29 Jul 20=
04
17:26:49 +0100 -----
                                                                       =
 
      To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU                                       =
 
                                                                       =
 
 Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Age=
nt
          Determination function module                                =
 
                                                                       =
 
 
G'day,
 
It may be a simple error of misspelt container references?
 
It is possible to debug the simulate dialog if you need. Create a deskt=
op
shortcut where you change the type from 'Transaction' to 'System' and t=
he
command to be '/h' and call it something like 'Debug dev'. You need to
minimise the SAP window such that you can see the desktop shortcut and =
the
simulate window at the same time. Drag the shortcut icon onto the title=
bar
of the simulate window and hit simulate. Once in the debugger set a
break-point at function module 'RH_GET_ACTORS' (can't remember if you c=
an
specify your own func mod).
 
HTH. I can't test at the moment because my access to the desktop is
blocked. If not try SAPFans.com for pop-up debugging.
 
BTW the archive is at www.wugarchive.com
 
Have fun,
Mark
 
 
 
 
 
                      "Chatterjee, Partha
                      (US - San Ramon)"           To:
SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
                      <pchatterjee at deloit         cc:
                      te.com>                     Subject: Re: Inconsis=
tent
behavior between SAP Rule and underlying Agent Determination
                      Sent by: SAP                function module
                      Workflow
                      <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
                      MA.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                      29 Jul 2004 16:03
                      Please respond to
                      SAP Workflow Users'
                      Group
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hi Serge,
 
Thanks for the reply.  All the containers elements are defined in the R=
ule.
In case, this occurs when I simulate the Rule.  The underlying function=
 
module works fine (and ACTOR_TAB is filled correctly) however when I
simulate the Rule it says No Agent Found (or Termination if I have that=
 
active).
 
Best regards,
Partha
 
        -----Original Message-----
        From: SAP Workflow on behalf of Serge Boulay
        Sent: Thu 7/29/2004 10:42 AM
        To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
        Cc:
        Subject: Re: Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underly=
ing
Agent Determination function module
 
 
 
        Hi,
 
        Did you have all the Container element defined in your role so =
that
it is
        use in your function?
 
        This is all I can see...
 
        Best regards.
 
        Serge
 
        -----Message d'origine-----
        De : SAP Workflow [mailto:Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU] De la p=
art
de
        Chatterjee, Partha (US - San Ramon)
        Envoy=E9 : 29 juillet 2004 09:35
        =C0 : SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
        Objet : Inconsistent behavior between SAP Rule and underlying A=
gent
        Determination function module
 
        Hi All,
 
        I have developed a very simple rule that picks some agents from=
 a
custom
        table.  When I execute the function module underlying the rule =
in
        test/debug, the function module always behaves as expected
returning the
        correct result to ACTOR_TAB.  However, if I simulate the rule I=
 get
'No
        Agent Found'.  I don't quite understand what is happening betwe=
en
the
        two places.  We are on 4.7 extension set 2.
 
        Has anyone run into this type of problem before?  The only rele=
vant
note
        I can find is 707767 but it is hard to know from the minimal
problem
        description whether its appropriate.
 
        Also, where is the place to search for q&a's on this forum.
 
        Best regards,
 
        > Partha Chatterjee
        >
 
 
 
        This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information
        intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protecte=
d by
law.  If
        you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this mess=
age.
Any
        disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the ta=
king
of any
        action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
 
 
 
 
 
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential informat=
ion
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law=
 
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. =
 Any
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of =
any
action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
 
 
 
 
 
=