Which userID for error notifications?

[Michael Pokraka]

Good thinking, just checked but no joy. Email address is blank, and this is workflow independent (e.g. "Work item 9999 in status STARTED" messages).
Thanks for the input though,
Cheers
Mike
 
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Kjetil Kilhavn wrote:
> Tame guess: his/her address is defined as e-mail address for WF-BATCH?
> If this only applies to IDoc workflows, check the partner responsibilities
> in IDoc/ALE customizing.
> --
> Kjetil Kilhavn
>
>
>
>
>
>                     Michael Pokraka
>                     <workflow at quirky.me.        To:     SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>                     uk>                         cc:     (bcc: Kjetil Kilhavn)
>                     Sent by: SAP                Subject:     Which userID for error notifications?
>                     Workflow
>                     <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
>                     A.MIT.EDU>
>
>
>                     20.06.2003 16:49
>                     Please respond to
>                     "SAP Workflow Users'
>                     Group"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> I've a Friday afternoon question, i.e. as noncritical as it gets:
>
> The system I'm working on generates emails on workflow failures, and the
> sender is mostly one of the Basis folks. The curious thing is that I'd
> always assumed it to be due to some or other background job running under
> his userID... not so.
>
> We checked all over SM37, SWU3, SM59.. no trace of his userID. The person
> in question denies all responsibility. I'm a bit puzzled whewre the sender
> comes from...
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Cheers & happy Friday,
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
> intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
> information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
> addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
> this message.
> Thank you.