Workflow definitions disappear

[Catherine Schumann]

46c support pack 27 - yes, somewhat behind, but our management wants to tre=
at support packs as upgrades (!)
 
Thanks - it is not deleting any other part of the definition, but it is a b=
it disconcerting not being able to find my workflow suddenly.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Pokraka [mailto:workflow at quirky.me.uk]
Sent: 18 February 2003 15:31
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Subject: Re: Workflow definitions disappear
 
 
Oops, sorry. 4.6c support pack 39.
I've logged it with OSS, will post any results if noone here has any
answer.
 
Cheers
Mike
 
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:21:15AM -0500, Nobles, Diane wrote:
> What version are you guys on????
>
> Diane H. Nobles
> SAP System Engineer, PM, WF
> (757) 380-7250
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Catherine Schumann [mailto:catherine.schumann at bbc.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 5:10 AM
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Re: Workflow definitions disappear
>
>
> I wish I had an answer, but the same thing has happened to us.
>
> It's good to know that it is not just us - we thought it was just somethi=
ng
> that we had done.  Now it looks like there may be a rational explanation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Pokraka [mailto:workflow at quirky.me.uk]
> Sent: 18 February 2003 10:05
> To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> Subject: Workflow definitions disappear
>
>
> Hi all,
> I'm going to report this to OSS, but just in case someone has seen this
> before:
> Doing nothing unusual, most of the workflow task information spontaneously
> combusts. Well, not actually, but all the fields go blank. Thus we end up
> with a task WS90000001, with no description and no further information. T=
ask
> abbreviation is also blank. I checked some of the underlying records in
> HRSOBJECT and HRS1000, and there s a record containing a key WS and
> 900000001, with the rest of the fields blank.
>
> The workflow itself is still fine, just the task cannot be found via sear=
ch
> help and basically does not exist unless you specifically type in the
> number. Then you can continue work on 'Unnamed' (with the flow and all ot=
her
> taskes intact).
>
> Even stranger, this has happened to two developers with two different
> workflows. The sequence of events is something along the lines of editing
> something, saving it - standard stuff, and sometime later we notice it's
> blank.
>
> Any ideas????
> Thanks
> Mike
>
>
> BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/
>
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain
> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically
> stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do
> not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the
> BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will
> signify your consent to this.
 
 
BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/
 
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain=20
personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically=20
stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do=20
not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in=20
reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the=20
BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will=20
signify your consent to this.