Assigning multiple users to positions
Swami Bala
swam_in at hotmail.com
Wed Feb 5 11:26:00 EST 2003
Ralph,
I remember having asked this ppoint slide long ago but did not receive one.
Can you copy me one too ?
Thanks a bunch !
Swami Bala
>From: "Nobles, Diane" <nobles_dh at naptheon.com>
>Reply-To: SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Assigning multiple users to positions
>Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:23:25 -0500
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com ([209.119.0.109]) by
>mc3-f25.law16.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 5 Feb
>2003 07:35:43 -0800
>Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com
>(LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id
><13.008CE353 at cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:35:16 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA.MIT.EDU by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release
>1.8e) with spool id 7336 for SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU; Wed, 5 Feb
>2003 10:35:01 -0500
>Received: from MITVMA (NJE origin SMTP at MITVMA) by MITVMA.MIT.EDU (LMail
> V1.2d/1.8d) with BSMTP id 2099; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:25:51 -0500
>Received: from napis66.naptheon.com [205.128.202.66] by mitvma.mit.edu (IBM
>VM SMTP Level 320) via TCP with SMTP ; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 10:25:29
>EST
>Received: by napis66.naptheon.com; id KAA26156; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:24:56
>-0500 (EST)
>Received: from mail.nns.com(172.30.10.115) by napis66.naptheon.com via smap
> (V5.5) id xmaa25692; Wed, 5 Feb 03 10:23:29 -0500
>Received: from npeimc02.nns.com ([172.30.18.167]) by nprdeg02. (NAVGW
>2.5.1.13) with SMTP id M2003020510232323311 for
><SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 10:23:23 -0500
>Received: by npeimc02.nns.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
> <1BPLQ6JF>; Wed, 5 Feb 2003 10:23:26 -0500
>X-Message-Info: dHZMQeBBv44lPE7o4B5bAg==
>X-Comment: mitvma.mit.edu: Mail was sent by napis66.naptheon.com
>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
>Approved-By: "Nobles, Diane" <nobles_dh at NAPTHEON.COM>
>Message-ID: <C56C94844E5CD611B4F0000347ACE8EC0255FDCD at nnse9.nns.com>
>Sender: SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
>Precedence: list
>Return-Path: owner-sap-wug at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Feb 2003 15:35:43.0492 (UTC)
>FILETIME=[3EC18440:01C2CD2C]
>
>Ralph I would like to see this presentation also. Can you forward it to me
>also.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ralph Jensen [mailto:ralph.jensen at us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 11:14 AM
>To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
>Subject: Re: Assigning multiple users to positions
>
>
>Fred,
>
>I have a drafted plan for implementing an Enterprise Organization Structure
>that you might want to review. Should I sent it to you? It's in MS Power
>Point.
>
>Regards,
>Ralph Jensen
>IBM Business Consulting Services
>Government Services Industry
>
>
>
>
> "Kouw, FA - SPLTC"
> <fa.kouw at td.klm.com To:
>SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
> > cc:
> Sent by: SAP Subject: Assigning
>multiple users to positions
> Workflow
> <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITV
> MA.MIT.EDU>
>
>
> 01/10/2003 09:20 AM
> Please respond to
> "SAP Workflow
> Users' Group"
>
>
>
>
>
>Hello workflow colleagues,
>
>Can someone tell me what are the disadvantages of assigning multiple users
>to the same position, in order to achieve that all users assigned to the
>position recieve the same workitem? At the moment we only use the
>organizational plan for workflow purposes, can it be a problem if we will
>use it in the future for HR purposes?
>
>Should I assign one person to a position (in case of parttimers maybe more
>than one) and use jobs to achieve what I want?
>
>Regards,
>
>Fred Kouw
>
>
>**********************************************************************
>This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged
>material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you
>are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed,
>copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this e-mail or
>attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have
>received
>this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return
>e-mail,
>and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its
>subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or
>incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible
>for any delay in receipt.
>**********************************************************************
>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_________________
>
>This outbound message from KPN has been checked for all known viruses by
>KPN
>IV-Scan, powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit:
>http://www.veiliginternet.nl
>____________________________________________________________________________
>_________________
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
More information about the SAP-WUG
mailing list