AW: AW: Excluded Agent

[Becker Stephan (extern)]

Hi Judy,
 
the functionality you described should work as you describe it -- =
excluded
agents can be an expression just as the possible ones. Double-check =
your
customizing and create an OSS message if the problems persist.
 
Hth,
Stephan
 
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jy R [mailto:Judy_Ryser at lincolnelectric.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2002 14:34
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Re: AW: Excluded Agent
 
 
Hi Stephan,
Sorry, I didn't know you cannot see the image file. I have a multistep =
WF,
in a user decision step I filled the excluded agent with a container
element. The container element has been populated in a step before this
user decision. In the test, I found out if I populate the container =
element
with position the users under the position will not be excluded. It =
only
works when I populate it with user id.
Thanks
Judy
 
 
 
 
 
"Becker Stephan (extern)" <Stephan.Becker.ext at mchw.siemens.de>
@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> on 05/14/2002 04:46:32 AM
 
Please respond to SAP Workflow Users' Group <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
Sent by:  SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
 
To:   SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
cc:
 
Subject:  AW: Excluded Agent
 
 
Hi Judy,
 
I am not sure what you are trying to achieve and how you are going =
about
it.
 
Please explain what ZTESTPOS is (a single step task in a multistep =
task?)
and where you fill in the position and/or the user id (field =
agent/excluded
agent etc.).
 
Thanks,
Stephan
 
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jy R [mailto:Judy_Ryser at lincolnelectric.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 13. Mai 2002 22:36
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Betreff: Excluded Agent
 
 
WF experts:
I have a user decision step in my WF. I used the following agents in =
the
step. If I populated ZTESTPOS with a position ( i.e  S 00001234 ), the
people under the position still get the WI. But if I populated ZTESTPOS
with user id ( i.e  USDSMITH ), it works OK, and DSMITH has been =
excluded.
Is it supposed to be like that? Or any OSS can fix it? I have checked, =
and
could not find any. We want to use position because if changing =
position
occurs, WF doesn't have to be changed. Of course we can create a custom
task to get the user Ids under the position. But if SAP already has the
solution, we would like to use it. We are in 46C.
 
(Embedded image moved to file: pic27595.pcx)
 
Thanks in advance.
Judy
 
 
**************************************************************
 Note:  The information contained in this message may be
 privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure.
 If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
 or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
 message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
 that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
 communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
 this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
 replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
 Thank you,
 The Lincoln Electric Company
**************************************************************