AW: SWW_CONT

[Jody I. Chassereau]

I am supporting workflow in a system that has been live in production for =
2 months and am trying to get up to speed on my options for administration =
(also new to this listserv).  I was not familiar with the SWUF transaction,=
 but had a look at it from all the discussion going on about work items.  =
Currently, we have stats of about 225,000 work headers and over 6,000,000 =
container instances.  The screen showing this gives green lights as the =
status.
 
We have not been able to implement any kind of data archiving at this =
point, but I am aware that trans SARA can be used with this.  My question =
to the group is: is there a guideline to help me know when this amount of =
data will be a problem?  I know as an administrator, I am constantly =
looking at workflow overviews for different scenarios that have kicked off =
since startup.  It is also very helpful for the users to be able to see =
the log information.  I guess I thought we would not want to lose that =
anytime soon by deleting work items or log data.  Maybe after a longer =
period of time (6 months? 1 year?), it would not be as critical.  Any =
suggestions on how this is handled in other implementations would be =
appreciated.
 
Thanks...
 
Jody Chassereau
jichass at westvaco.com
 
>>> Marc.Giesinger at egger.com 07/18/01 10:12AM >>>
thanks to all
 
we also do not need the data in produktivsystem !
i running the deleting jobs (RSWWWIDE, RSWWHIDE and also RSWWCIDE) nearly
every week, but the SWW_CONT wont get less ... so we think something is
wrong with this part of WFD system ??
 
about 400.000 workitem header entries  in SWWIHEAD and over 16.300.000 in
SWW_CONT
 
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Gregory Kowalik [mailto:gkowalik at ashland.com]=20
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 15:56
An: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
Betreff: Re: SWW_CONT
 
 
I am with you Diane.
I am running deletion job in production everyday, since we don't need that
data.
I do not want to bother with creating files and then deleting them.
 
It's just general SAP's recommendation to archive.
 
Greg
 
 
 
 
 
 
"Nobles, Diane" <nobles_dh at naptheon.com>@MITVMA.MIT.EDU> on 07/18/2001
09:49:16 AM
 
Please respond to "SAP Workflow Users' Group" <SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
Sent by:  SAP Workflow <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU>
 
 
To:   SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
cc:
Subject:  Re: SWW_CONT
 
 
Please answer that question for me.  If I do not need this data, why =
should
I archive?? Even in Production!!
 
Diane H. Nobles
SDE PM Team
(757)380-7250
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Blessed are those that hear the word
of the Lord and practice it. Luke 11:28
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Robin Sahasranam [mailto:Rsahasranam at worldbank.org]=20
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 9:45 AM
To: SAP-WUG at MITVMA.MIT.EDU=20
Subject: Re: SWW_CONT
 
 
The workitem and history deletion reports: RSWWWIDE  and RSWWHIDE
(transaction
SWUL) will delete container instances for selected workitems. You should
however
Archive and delete (transaction SARA), if possible.
 
 
 
                    Giesinger Marc
                    <Marc.Giesinger at egge        To:
Sap-Wug at Mitvma.Mit.Edu=20
                    r.com>                      cc:
                    Sent by: SAP                Subject:     SWW_CONT
                    Workflow
                    <Owner-SAP-WUG at MITVM
                    A.MIT.EDU>
 
 
                    07/17/2001 09:02 AM
                    Please respond to
                    SAP Workflow Users'
                    Group
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hi Folks
 
a little question about transaction SWUF "watchdog for runtime tables"
 
at the point Containber Instance we have about 16.300.000 entries in our
produktiv system  ?!
so where can i delete this intance data ??? i know its the tbles SWW_CONT
...
 
thanks in advance
 
Marc