[OWW-Discuss] Invite someone to join OpenWetWare...
Ilya Sytchev
ilyas at MIT.EDU
Mon Feb 25 13:02:13 EST 2008
I think we need a simpler form. Here's a mock up of what I have in mind
(fields borrowed from pandora.com):
http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Ilya/Sandbox
Jason Kelly wrote:
>> F. Should we allow for sending invitations to more than one person? We can
>> do a whole lab if we want; I'm current;y taking in just one name.
>
>> They probably can just send it to a mailing list.
>
> I think it would be nice to list multiple addresses in case you want
> to invite a few of your friends. Also, not sure why they need to put
> in the name of the invitee, email address should be enough.
>
> cool, this is a great addition for outreach / recruitment.
>
> thanks,
> jason
>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Austin Che <austin at csail.mit.edu> wrote:
>> > 3. The person who invited the user currently isn't being sent. I think this
>> > may be important; I've added support for it but I have a few questions.
>> >
>> > A. Should people need to be logged in to send the message?
>>
>> Definitely. Avoid being a spam relay.
>>
>>
>> > B. Should the name of the member be included in the message?
>>
>> Yes. That's much more likely to get a response.
>>
>>
>> > C. Where should we put the button or label to send the invitation?
>>
>> Maybe on the how to join page.
>>
>>
>> > D. Should we record the invite and then send a message to the person who
>> > submitted the invitation when the invitee registers?
>>
>> That might be difficult to tell unless you have some unique cookie
>> or something for them to accept the invitation. It would be easier
>> to do the reverse and have a field on registration that has the
>> inviter's user name. Even better, it should be possible to
>> generate a link that when clicked, pre-fills out the registration
>> form with various items (such as inviter's name, maybe the lab, etc.)
>>
>>
>> > E. Should we allow the person submitting the invitation to add an additional
>> > comment?
>>
>> Can't think of why not.
>>
>>
>> > F. Should we allow for sending invitations to more than one person? We can
>> > do a whole lab if we want; I'm current;y taking in just one name.
>>
>> They probably can just send it to a mailing list.
>>
>>
>> > G. Should we offer to cc: the message sent out to the person sending the
>> > invitation?
>>
>> Sure why not.
>>
>>
>> > Recording the invitation isn't a lot more effort to implement and would make
>> > for a way to let users know we appreciate their efforts. It also gives us
>> > quantitative info on who's being invited and how often the inviation is
>> > acted upon.
>>
>> Might as well record it if possible.
>>
>> I think we need to implement a karma system. 'Worthless' numbers
>> indicating the value of a member is surprisingly good at
>> motivating people to do things in communities. We can do something
>> like the weighted sum of:
>> - number of invited people
>> - total number of edits
>> - number of articles created
>> - number of emails sent to discuss mailing list
>> - etc.
>>
>> --
>> Austin Che <austin at csail.mit.edu> (617)253-5899
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenWetWare Discussion Mailing List
>> discuss at openwetware.org
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenWetWare Discussion Mailing List
> discuss at openwetware.org
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/oww-discuss
More information about the Oww-discuss
mailing list