[Olympus] Fwd: Acceptance LV16638 Bernauer

[Brinker, Frank]

Hi Jan and Axel,

Congratulations! A greater Party might be tricky these times. I'd really
like to join and see you again.

Frank

>-----Original Message-----
>From: olympus-bounces at mit.edu <olympus-bounces at mit.edu> On Behalf Of Jan
>C. Bernauer
>Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 6:58 PM
>To: olympus <olympus at mit.edu>
>Subject: [Olympus] Fwd: Acceptance LV16638 Bernauer
>
>
>
>
>Party?
>
>Party!
>
>
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>Subject: 	Acceptance LV16638 Bernauer
>Date: 	Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:53:10 -0400
>From: 	prl at aps.org
>Reply-To: 	prl at aps.org
>To: 	jan.bernauer at stonybrook.edu
>
>
>
>Re: LV16638
>Measurement of the charge-averaged elastic lepton-proton scattering
>cross section by the OLYMPUS experiment
>by J. C. Bernauer, A. Schmidt, B. S. Henderson, et al.
>
>Dear Dr. Bernauer,
>
>We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been accepted
>for publication in Physical Review Letters. We would also like to
>bring the appended referee comments to your attention.
>
>Your manuscript will now be prepared for the production process. If
>any issues arise we will contact you; otherwise your manuscript will
>be forwarded directly to our production department. Please do not send
>a revised manuscript or figures at this time unless requested.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>Kevin Dusling
>Associate Editor
>Physical Review Letters
>Email: prl at aps.org
>https://journals.aps.org/prl/
>
>NEWS FROM THE PHYSICAL REVIEW JOURNALS
>
>Eight Physical Review journals introduce Letters, retire
>Rapid Communications
>http://go.aps.org/3pWrlUS
>
>Promoting Inclusive and Respectful Communications
>http://go.aps.org/2IU1psq
>
>APS paying all APC fees for fully open access PRX Quantum in 2021
>http://go.aps.org/2WjdH0H
>
>
>PUBLICITY:
>
>Authors of accepted papers are encouraged to submit a summary that
>clarifies
>the new elements of the work and their expected impact. These summaries
>help
>APS editors consider papers for coverage in the following places:
>
>- Physics (https://physics.aps.org): Daily news and commentary describing
>a
>selection of papers from the APS journal collection.
>
>- Media tip sheet (https://journals.aps.org/press): Weekly email message
>distributed to journalists from Science, Nature, the New York Times, and
>many other publications.
>
>- Editors' Suggestions (https://journals.aps.org/prl/highlights): Papers
>that are prominently displayed on the journal websites because they are
>judged to
>be particularly important, interesting, or well written.
>
>- Physics Buzz Blog (https://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com): Posts
>covering a wide range of physics topics of interest to the general
>public.
>
>Guidelines for writing and submitting a summary:
>https://journals.aps.org/authors/publicity-outreach-instructions-authors
>
>CONTACT YOUR PRESS OFFICE:
>Please inform your institution's public information or press office as
>soon as
>possible about this acceptance. This office may publish newsletters and
>reports
>describing your institution's research or it may keep lists of papers
>published
>in major journals. In some cases the writers may want to publicize your
>work
>with the local media, and they need as much lead time as possible. To
>find the
>appropriate office, try searching for your institution's name at
>https://www.newswise.com/resources/ncd/.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Third Report of Referee A -- LV16638/Bernauer
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>The author has responded well to my question in my second round of the
>review and I am happy with the response. I recommend the publication
>of this paper in PRL.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Third Report of Referee B -- LV16638/Bernauer
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>I am glad that Referee A compared the modified numbers in Table II in
>the second version to the ones from the first version of the
>manuscript after my first report led the authors to discover a bug in
>their uncertainty calculations. While the magnitude of the changes is
>concerning, I am satisfied by the authors' explanation for why they
>are now confident that the quoted uncertainties in Table II are
>reliable. In any case the changes are not order-of-magnitude level and
>the changes do not appear to meaningfully affect the physics
>conclusions of the paper or the likely impact of these results on form
>factor extractions. Having said that, it is important that the
>published uncertainties be correct, because these results will likely
>be re-used many times in future global analyses.
>
>I thank the authors for adding the curve of Ye et al. to Figure 2. It
>seems to be in very good agreement with the data, which maybe suggests
>that Ye et al. are on the right track with their method for applying
>two-photon-exchange corrections to the data. It would have also been
>nice to see the uncertainty band of the Ye et al. analysis
>superimposed together with the central curve, but I realize this might
>have required more substantial work, might be more difficult to
>implement correctly without introducing mistakes or misinterpretations
>for this observable, and also might have made the plot too "busy", so
>I can certainly see the advantage of showing only the central curve.
>
>So in summary, the plot is fine as-is. I do not believe that the paper
>needs further revision, assuming that the uncertainties given in Table
>II are now the correct ones.
>
>--
>Dr. Jan C. Bernauer
>Assistant Professor
>Department of Physics and Astronomy
>Stony Brook University
>Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/olympus/attachments/20210323/e801b306/at
>tachment.html
>_______________________________________________
>Olympus mailing list
>Olympus at mit.edu
>http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/olympus