[mosh-devel] Fwd: Bug#663291: please split package into server and client packages

Karl Ramm kcr at 1ts.org
Sun Mar 11 00:52:09 EST 2012


I think it adds needless complexity, especially since the client and server
seem to be linked with all the same stuff and so would have the same
dependencies, and the effort is not worth saving 300k of installed disk
space for people who have the rm command available.

I for one would be tempted out of sheer perversity at this point to merge
them into one binary.

(Also, Keith, are you referring to #662939 there as the other bug?  That's
more of a fine point about dependencies and the multiplicity of ssh
implementations in debian..)

kcr

seph <seph at MIT.EDU> writes:

> Some people have policy about how they have the minimal set of things on
> the server. I haven't really decided about the merits of that sort of
> policy, but removing the binaries people don't need isn't that hard. I
> think if it's easy enough, may as well just do it. (And I think it's
> pretty easy)
>
> seph
>
> Keith Winstein <keithw at MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>> Do our Debian experts have an opinion on whether this is worth doing? We've
>> gotten two bugs asking for a separate server package.
>>
>> I would not have thought it was worth it (the client just sits there,
>> although it does pull in openssh-client), but don't really feel that
>> strongly.
>>
>> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> mosh-devel mailing list
> mosh-devel at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-devel



More information about the mosh-devel mailing list