[mosh-devel] Updated: mosh-1.2.2-2 (experimental)

[Reini Urban]

On 07/20/2012 10:07 AM, Alexander Chernyakhovsky wrote:
> While I defer to Keith on this, I think releasing this as "1.2.2-2" is going to result in confusion, because it implies it's
 > the 2nd build of 1.2.2 for the distribution. Normally I would not 
object to this, because that appears to be the case, but
 >these changes are sufficiently large that I think a 1.2.2-2 label 
would be confusing, especially when compared
> with 1.2.2-2in other distributions, e.g, Fedora, which issued that number for the 
mass-rebuild for Fedora 18
 > (after a new GCC and friends were brought in).
> I would like to suggest a stronger differentiation in the version number than just "-2".
 > Perhaps some sort of additional label?

You are right, that's why I brought it up.

I will rename it to something like
1.2.3pre at cxxwrapper-1 or 1.2.2+git at cxxwrapper-1 or such.

1.3pre has a bad sorting order I fear, as the "." (46) is before any 
letter or digit.

Any other distro to try cxxwrapper as experimental?

  ________________________________________
> From: mosh-devel-bounces at MIT.EDU [mosh-devel-bounces at MIT.EDU] on behalf of Keith Winstein [keithw at MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 11:03 AM
> To: Reini Urban
> Cc: mosh-devel at mit.edu
> Subject: Re: [mosh-devel] Updated: mosh-1.2.2-2 (experimental)
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Reini Urban<reini at cpanel.net>  wrote:
>> I'm not comfortable to release this cygwin package as current,
>> it really is mosh-1.3.
>
> It's fine with us if you release this as 1.2.2-2. It will be a while
> before we put out a stable 1.3 (which will have Peter's C++ code, plus
> scrollback and a bunch of other features).

-- 
Reini