[miso-users] miso version choose

[Yarden Katz]

I'm not aware of any accuracy differences -- how are you defining "false-positives"?  The new version is written in C, so it's naturally faster.

  --Yarden




On May 6, 2012, at 9:33 PM, Li Ting wrote:

> Dear Yarden,
>  
> When using MISO to analysis our RNA-Seq data, we found that the oldest version of MISO (wchich was downloaded on 2011-10-26(yarden-MISO-b01739b)) was much more accurate(less false-positive results) while much slower than the current one (2011-12-19 and 2012-03-12(misopy-0.4.1)). So I wonder why? Besides, I would like to know which version was more suitable for me to use if I want a miso version with less false-positive results and much faster running speed?
>  
> Hope you can explain the phenomenon clearly. And look forward to your reply. Thanks in advance.
>  
> Yours sincerely,
>  
> Tiffany Lee
>  
> _______________________________________________
> miso-users mailing list
> miso-users at mit.edu
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/miso-users