[Macpartners] Apple Powerbook Display Scam
Matthew Walburn
matt at math.mit.edu
Tue Feb 17 10:10:38 EST 2004
> The article with Apple's policy is here:
>
> http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=22194
I understand the policy.
My primary issue is that since this IS their policy, that they owe it
to their customers to make this policy known at the time of purchase.
It's unethical and misleading to sell a $3000 computer in good faith to
someone and then have this little "policy" hidden away to cover them
when things go wrong. It's blatant deception of consumers... executed
because apparently Apple won't stand behind the quality of their
displays.
If this is going to be their policy, one of the following should be
true: a) customers need to be educated of this policy at the time of
purchase, so that they can decide if they want to take the risk, or b)
customers need to be allowed to examine the merchandise they are about
to spend that considerable amount of cash on. Why doesn't Apple allow
these things? Because if they did they wouldn't be able to sell as many
LCDs. They'd be be forced to step up their quality control and that
would affect their profit margins. Instead, Apple (literally) gives you
a black box, one that you're not allowed to open before purchase. How
convenient for them.
Would you buy a car if you weren't allowed to kick the tires a bit and
take it for a test drive? I don't think so. The only reason I didn't
insist on this with the laptop is because I was told I had 10 days to
return a defective item, with no stipulations explained to me as to
what constitutes "defective". It is not the consumers responsibility to
dig through Apple's knowledge base to become educated on the gotchas of
their return policy, it's the responsibility of Apple and their sales
people.
<rant off>
-Matthew
--
Matthew Walburn, RHCE
Network Assistant - x. 3-4995
MIT Department of Mathematics
More information about the Macpartners
mailing list