Kerberos transport DNS record design
mrogers at redhat.com
Tue Jun 7 11:56:53 EDT 2016
On 06/01, Petr Spacek wrote:
> For the record, opinions of DNS gurus from dnsop list can be found in dnsop
> indicates that it might be possible to standardize this if you try it.
> argues that URI is good enough and that TXT is a bad practice.
> Pick an answer which suits you the best :-)
Since there is encouragement for URI here it seems like moving forward
with the URI is the right thing to do. If the hosting
provider/middle-box issue is something that we do not need to worry
about, is there still a downside to settling on the URI right now and
standardizing it in parallel? From the code standpoint there will not
be much difference vs. the TXT RR.
Red Hat, Inc
More information about the krbdev