Project review: Interposer mechanisms
simo at redhat.com
Thu Oct 4 20:52:19 EDT 2012
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 10:45 +1000, Luke Howard wrote:
> On 05/10/2012, at 10:35 AM, Simo Sorce <simo at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Well in theory no, in practice I currently only really support the
> > kerberos mechanism for practical reasons.
> So something like SPNEGO still runs in the client's address space?
SPNEGO is not interposed by design atm.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the krbdev