Project review: Interposer mechanisms

[Simo Sorce]

On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 10:45 +1000, Luke Howard wrote:
> On 05/10/2012, at 10:35 AM, Simo Sorce <simo at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well in theory no, in practice I currently only really support the
> > kerberos mechanism for practical reasons.
> 
> 
> So something like SPNEGO still runs in the client's address space?

SPNEGO is not interposed by design atm.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York