Commits to krb5-appl
Sam Hartman
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Wed Mar 21 17:13:31 EDT 2012
>>>>> "Greg" == Greg Hudson <ghudson at MIT.EDU> writes:
Greg> On 03/20/2012 08:58 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> It looks like I have commit access to the krb5-appl repository.
>> Should I just go ahead and commit these? If so, should I create
>> tickets for them as well, or just commit?
Greg> Yes, you can commit them. I don't think we need tickets for
Greg> changes this small. (They may get backported to the release
Greg> branch, but krb5-appl is sleepy enough that we don't need to
Greg> use the ticketing system to track backport-eligible commits.)
I kind of wonder if it's sleepy enough that a release branch does more
harm than good.
Or at least whether you want a new release branch for every point
release.
I can see possibly having a branch while stabilizing something, but it
seems like you more or less want any trunk changes since the last
release for any new release of something as low-churn as krb5-appl.
--Sam
More information about the krbdev
mailing list