Default client keytab name
dalmeida at MIT.EDU
Sun Jul 22 22:43:15 EDT 2012
Oops. I had missed the "not" between "should" and "introduce" in your earlier e-mail.
From: Nico Williams [mailto:nico at cryptonector.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2012 11:08 AM
To: Danilo Almeida
Cc: ghudson at mit.edu; krbdev at mit.edu
Subject: Re: Default client keytab name
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Danilo Almeida <dalmeida at mit.edu> wrote:
>> No, it's the same format. We should not introduce a new file
>> type suffix, IMO.
> Such as .clkeytab, right? Sounds good to me. Or perhaps .clikeytab?
No, same format == same suffix, .keytab.
More information about the krbdev