Default client keytab name
simo at redhat.com
Sun Jul 22 10:20:48 EDT 2012
On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 19:47 -0700, Danilo Almeida wrote:
> > No, it's the same format. We should not introduce a new file
> > type suffix, IMO.
> Such as .clkeytab, right? Sounds good to me. Or perhaps .clikeytab?
We should just use .keytab, the file format is exactly the same and
indeed in some cases I see people symlinking the acceptor keytab to the
client keytab in some configurations, so having a different suffix makes
little sense to me.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the krbdev