: Why are we using libverto again
nico at cryptonector.com
Thu Jul 7 14:15:13 EDT 2011
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu> wrote:
> I understand that. And based on your description of a simple
> intermediary, that made some sense. However the complexity of the
> intermediary has far exceeded what I was expecting. I'll admit that my
> original simple vision wouldn't have worked, but I think we should all
> carefully consider what we got and whether it's worth the cost.
I don't think it's terribly complicated. It's simple, actually. The
one problem identified so far is the use of dladdr(), and I think both
uses of it are unnecessary (clever, but unnecessary).
More information about the krbdev