r24304 : 0 cheksum type on k_verify_checksum_iov

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman <hartmans at MIT.EDU> writes:

    Sam> Luke, I don't really object to the change, although I'm puzzled
    Sam> why it is necessary.  Doesn't the krb5_checksum object have a
    Sam> checksum type?  When do you need to guess checksum type on
    Sam> verify?  _______________________________________________ krbdev

Ah.
I should have realized the answer to this...  
If you're implementing something that looks a lot like RFC 4121 but is
not Kerberos, you need this.