X-CACHECONF in cache type 0504

Greg Hudson ghudson at MIT.EDU
Thu Nov 18 14:05:39 EST 2010

On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 14:00 -0500, Tim Alsop wrote:
> Is it possible that the MIT klist is not showing the extra entry ? We are
> not using MIT klist, which might be why we see it ?
> Just a thought.

I verified by stepping through the code which writes the config entry,
and also by displaying the cache with a 1.6 klist.

More information about the krbdev mailing list