krb5 libraries and circular dependencies
Nicolas.Williams at oracle.com
Thu Jun 3 11:12:35 EDT 2010
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 04:10:42AM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> --On Monday, May 31, 2010 07:48:35 PM -0500 Nicolas Williams
> <Nicolas.Williams at oracle.com> wrote:
> >There's no reason to use Solaris threads instead of pthreads: under the
> >hood they are the same thing.
> To be extra-clear: Solaris threads and pthreads are different API's
> onto the same underlying thread system. You can mix and match the
> API's with impunity.
Right. For portability you'll want to stick to pthreads.
> >I don't know about Mach (or did you mean MacOS?).
> If you look closely and squint just right, MacOS _is_ Mach.
I know, but it's also BSDish. I don't know enough about developing
threaded apps in C in MacOS.
More information about the krbdev