hartmans at painless-security.com
Thu Aug 12 08:54:13 EDT 2010
>>>>> "Derrick" == Derrick Brashear <shadow at gmail.com> writes:
>> Although there are many institutions for whom KfW and NIM are
>> very important, no one thus far has stepped forward, either as an
>> organization or as an individual, and said that they feel
>> strongly enough about either to enable the work required to
>> continue to make this a viable platform.
Derrick> The releases available at
Derrick> http://www.secure-endpoints.com/#kfw (and, notably, not
Derrick> from MIT) suggest otherwise. Do you have additional details
Derrick> you can share which suggest otherwise?
Certainly A lot of people find KFW 3.2.2 useful. I think the
interesting question is whether anyone is willing to put money or their
own time behind updating KFW to a more recent version of the core
I think there's an assumption in my mind and probably the mind of a lot
of people here that without updates to the core libraries that code base
will eventually bit-rot.
More information about the krbdev