preauth (I'm a Roomba in a 2'x2' room)

[Greg Hudson]

On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 17:54 -0400, Jeff Blaine wrote:
>  > 3.2.  Initial Pre-authentication Required Error
[...]

> So clearly this has been thought of.  Do we just say that
> MIT Kerberos does not support this draft yet?  Or do we just
> say that the statements above are purely hypothetical and
> not part of the real draft's intended scope?

We don't make use of authentication sets, but they are not a required
feature of the specification.