export list symbols

[Jeffrey Hutzelman]

--On Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:07:55 AM -0500 Nicolas Williams 
<Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> wrote:

> I think I missed that these were functions not listed in krb5.h.  If a
> function is in a private header then I agree that automated static
> analysis is sufficient for deciding whether to make it not an exported
> symbol.  Except for private-that-should-be-public symbols, of course,
> but that can be revisited later.

What about symbols which were previously removed from the public headers 
(or were never prototyped), but remain exported to maintain backward 
compatibility with existing users?

-- Jeff