Preliminary discussion: DB alias entries
Nicolas.Williams at sun.com
Tue Mar 10 22:26:40 EDT 2009
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:16:32PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> For service principals I believe this level of support is sufficient as
> is, because we don't canonicalize service principal names anyway. Does
> that seem accurate?
Yes. Has it been tested?
> For user principal aliases you do presumably want to canonicalize the
> name--but I am not aware of any use cases for user principal aliases
> other than case-folding.
Windows "UPNs," perhaps?
More information about the krbdev