Preliminary discussion: DB alias entries
Nicolas.Williams at sun.com
Thu Mar 5 12:33:50 EST 2009
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Sam proposes separating the alias database from the principal database
> to facilitate integration.
See my follow-up to Sam's post.
> If we go that route for DB2--say, using a second DB2 database for
> aliases--how do people think LDAP aliases should be handled? Perhaps a
> separate container DN for aliases?
I'd certainly like the _option_ to be able to use the LDAP krb5 schema
as an extension of the RFC2307bis+ schema.
More information about the krbdev