Preliminary discussion: DB alias entries

[Nicolas Williams]

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:27:07PM -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Sam proposes separating the alias database from the principal database
> to facilitate integration.

See my follow-up to Sam's post.

> If we go that route for DB2--say, using a second DB2 database for
> aliases--how do people think LDAP aliases should be handled?  Perhaps a
> separate container DN for aliases?

I'd certainly like the _option_ to be able to use the LDAP krb5 schema
as an extension of the RFC2307bis+ schema.