krb5.h and KRB5_PRIVATE

Jeffrey Altman jaltman at secure-endpoints.com
Sat Jan 6 09:17:30 EST 2007


Ken Raeburn wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2007, at 07:51, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>> The number of private functions and data structures in krb5.h is truly
>> hideous.
>>
>> Can we move these declarations into a new header file krb5priv.h which
>> is only included in krb5.h if KRB5_PRIVATE is defined?
>
> Why not just move them to k5-int.h, and update a few internal files if
> necessary to include that instead of just krb5.h?
>
> Ken
I would argue that many of those functions have been exported (at least
on KFW)
and that there are applications that currently build by defining
KRB5_PRIVATE
before including krb5.h


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3355 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/attachments/20070106/bb70f0bc/attachment.bin


More information about the krbdev mailing list