config option inconsistencies
kwc at citi.umich.edu
Thu Nov 16 17:11:44 EST 2006
On 11/16/06, Henry B. Hotz <hotz at jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Nov 16, 2006, at 9:02 AM, krbdev-request at mit.edu wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:25:58 +0100
> > From: Love H?rnquist ?strand <lha at kth.se>
> > Subject: Re: config option inconsistencies
> > To: Kevin Coffman <kwc at citi.umich.edu>
> > Cc: heimdal-discuss at sics.se, Kerveros-dev <krbdev at mit.edu>
> > Message-ID: <D483046F-EDA8-4E6D-9CF4-29396DFE280C at kth.se>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> > 16 nov 2006 kl. 16.31 skrev Kevin Coffman:
> >> There are currently inconsistencies in the use of underscores and
> >> hyphens in the Heimdal (pkinit/pki) config parameters. I think there
> >> are also inconsistencies with "pki-" vs. "pkinit-" in some cases? Is
> >> it too late, too painful, to make these consistent at this point?
> > No, its not. Prefix with pkinit and use _ ?
> > Love
> Hmmm. How about the no addresses option?
> no-addresses = true
> no_addresses = true
> noaddresses = true
> Or are you guys just trying to keep me on my toes? ;-)
I was just talking about new options being added for pkinit. I'm
pretty sure it would be too painful (for the installed base) at this
point to change these.
More information about the krbdev