More on graylisting

[Philip Prindeville]

Nicolas Williams wrote:

>>>I've been too busy with other things to look at the patches or even  
>>>the general idea myself, but I can tell you gdbm is likely to be a  
>>>problem for licensing reasons.
>>>
>>>Ken
>>>      
>>>
>>Ok, what about the old DBM interface then?
>>    
>>
>
>MIT krb5 already uses berkeley db2...
>  
>

Anyone have a chance to read the diffs with the db2 patches?  The only
issue is I'm wondering what the best way to harden the code for failure
would be, in the case where calls to open or update the database don't
take...

-Philip