(Final?) krb5.Conf Lexer/Parser Proposal

Henry B. Hotz hotz at jpl.nasa.gov
Fri Jan 6 21:36:50 EST 2006

On Jan 6, 2006, at 1:16 PM, krbdev-request at mit.edu wrote:

> The only reason I can see why my argument would be flawed is if there
> is some tag in a section configuration that could make the section
> valid for one user and invalid for another.  If such a tag existed it
> might be necessary for a small number of users to override a valid
> section.  Note that this tag would have to be a multi-valued tag
> (like "kdc") because single-value tags can already be overridden
> without using the final signifier.
> Can anyone think of such a tag?  Would we even want to create such a
> tag?  It seems to me that even the existence of a tag like that would
> be a bad idea since it would create an easy way for sysadmins to
> cause problems for their sites.

Due to firewall issues the list of kdc's may be different in  
different places.

The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
Henry.B.Hotz at jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz at oxy.edu

More information about the krbdev mailing list