Current ideas on kerberos requirements for Samba4
Nicolas Williams
Nicolas.Williams at Sun.COM
Fri May 27 02:16:12 EDT 2005
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 01:06:55AM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 08:00:18AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
> > so the design would be like this:
> >
> > [wire] -> [samba socket lib] -> [samba kdc server service] -> [KDC library]
> > [wire] <- [samba socket lib] <- [samba kdc server service] <- [KDC library]
>
> I suppose I don't mind a "KDC library too much..." but, methinks that this
> is going too far. My first reaction, really, is "ick."
BTW, I think coding services in such a way that they can be made into a
library with ease is a good idea. But usually existing code has not
been written that way... I think you'll find the alternative easier to
implement.
What I don't understand is why you want everything in one process --
what's wrong with IPC in this case?
Nico
--
More information about the krbdev
mailing list