Future of kerberised telnet, login, rsh, ftp?
abartlet at samba.org
Wed Jul 6 19:26:15 EDT 2005
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:18 -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Now, if it happened (as the MIT folks indicated) that these utilities
> > were being split out from the main tarball, then I would have less files
> > to watch, and I would not have security auditors telling me that Samba4
> > is vulnerable to issues in programs we don't ship, but are included in
> > the same upstream Heimdal version number.
> The MIT folks have made no statements regarding the intended directory
> of the Heimdal distribution. We can only speak for our own distribution.
And I meant no implication otherwise: the Samba folks don't speak for
Samba-TNG either! I simply meant to illustrate my point with a concrete
example about the splitting of the apps from the main tarball.
I'm also not saying such bundling is bad: the Samba Team could be
accused of the same bundling, and each project has it's reasons for
their distribution structure, but I find this discussion interesting and
the possible outcomes quite useful to my particular corner case.
Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/
Samba Developer, SuSE Labs, Novell Inc. http://suse.de
Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College http://hawkerc.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/attachments/20050707/923dcac5/attachment.bin
More information about the krbdev