Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Tue May 4 12:53:20 EDT 2004
>>>>> "Love" == Love <lha at stacken.kth.se> writes:
Love> Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu> writes:
>> So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs
>> non-oid question will already be settled by then.
Love> I consider the ioctl + skim with implemetion specific ioctl
Love> layer mostly useless. It will make force application
Love> developers to deal with an exploding API.
I consider an exploding API desirable. Well it is more like I want
application authors to be able to call APIs for the extensions they
I'll drop heimdal-discuss from
future posts as it seems we have incompatible goals.
More information about the krbdev