Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

[Sam Hartman]

>>>>> "Love" == Love  <lha at stacken.kth.se> writes:

    Love> Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu> writes:

    >> So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs
    >> non-oid question will already be settled by then.

    Love> I consider the ioctl + skim with implemetion specific ioctl
    Love> layer mostly useless. It will make force application
    Love> developers to deal with an exploding API.

I consider an exploding API desirable.  Well it is more like I want
application authors to be able to call APIs for the extensions they
need.


I'll drop heimdal-discuss from
future posts as it seems we have incompatible goals.