Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI
hartmans at MIT.EDU
Mon May 3 16:46:38 EDT 2004
>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com> writes:
Nicolas> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:05:38PM -0400, Sam Hartman
>> >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at sun.com>
Nicolas> But are you suggesting that the shim-to-ioctl part not be
>> I think doing so will be a lot of work and I think that a
>> compelling value case with specific examples would need to be
>> made before I'd agree this is a valuable use of our time.
Nicolas> In that case we'll just have to wait, period. At least
Nicolas> until after the 60th IETF, where we'll be busy with
Nicolas> KITTEN BoF stuff anyhow.
I'm not sure that time frame is acceptable to Kevin.
I suspect we'll need to decide on a solution relatively soon.
So I think at least for the MIT implementation the oid vs non-oid
question will already be settled by then.
More information about the krbdev