Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

Mon May 3 15:42:09 EDT 2004

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 03:09:14PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Love" == Love  <lha at stacken.kth.se> writes:
> 
>     Love> Sam, you want to make the remove the possibility that
>     Love> gssapi's ABI independant of the implementation ?
> 
> GSSAPI does not specify an ABI.  But I don't understand your message.

RFC2744 speaks to this issue.  While it doesn't specify an ABI it does
encourage implementors to specify one.