Mechanism extensions and the GSSAPI

Sam Hartman hartmans at MIT.EDU
Mon May 3 13:14:25 EDT 2004

>>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at> writes:

    Nicolas> On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 10:21:20AM +0200, Love wrote:
    Love> I though about this some time ago. I think you are missing
    Love> two things if this api should go forward; ability list all
    Love> options, options are specified oid.

    Nicolas> Agreed.

I think I disagree.  I'd rather the extension be specified at the shim
layer not at the ioctl layer.  So the operation code is an internal
matter for the implementation.  Thus I see no reason for it to be an

More information about the krbdev mailing list