mit-krb5 thread support -- fork safety
wyllys.ingersoll at sun.com
Thu Apr 22 07:57:30 EDT 2004
[ I'm taking this discussion to krbdev... ]
Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>>"Wyllys" == Wyllys Ingersoll <wyllys.ingersoll at sun.com> writes:
> Wyllys> OK, now I remember. I'm going to take a look at your initializer
> Wyllys> and allocator functions to see if we can use the same method. I found lots
> Wyllys> of places in the code where keys are manipulated in different ways,
> Wyllys> so I didn't consider doing this originally.
>It's going to be a major headache. There are lots of places as you
>point out where keyblocks are handled improperly.
>The hope is that the critical path key operations do not work this
There are alot of places in the kerberos client utilities (kdb5_util,
etc ) where keyblocks are used and manipulated which makes it even harder
to come up with a single interface for managing them.
More information about the krbdev