krb5-1.2.6 on Win32
Douglas E. Engert
deengert at anl.gov
Thu Sep 26 17:49:01 EDT 2002
Some more information on performance.
It looks like the FTP and Zone Alarm don't get along. When both
are running, they use 100% of the CPU, and a transfer takes 72 seconds
at 27Kb. If I cancel ZoneAlarm, The FTP uses 100% but the transfer
takes only 5 seconds with 3500Kb rate.
Its the same with passive mode.
So the performance problem looks like a newer Zone Alarm, not Kerberos.
Sorry about that.
The krb5.exe is still slow, as Ken also pointed out.
Sam Hartman wrote:
> There haven't really been any significant changes in krb5 between
> 1.2.x versions.
> Can you profile it and see where time is spent?
Douglas E. Engert <DEEngert at anl.gov>
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
More information about the krbdev