our SPNEGO direction

Kevin Coffman kwc at citi.umich.edu
Wed Nov 13 12:36:01 EST 2002

> > Well, that's why I did evaluate the umich patch.  But unless someone
> > is willing to write code and give it to MIT under a license MIT will
> > accept, then wanting mechglue is very likely to continue to be a
> > nothing more than a desire.
> > 
> > If someone has serious time or money to dedicate to this project we'd
> > be happy to discuss design and some of our portability concerns.  I do
> > believe it is not particularly difficult to do the mechglue layer; I
> > simply don't have time and don't ex pect MIT to have time in the
> > future.
> We should talk more about what we currently have, and what
> you'd like to see in order for it to be accepted back.  My
> current priority is to get the RPC code into an acceptable
> state, but the mechglue code is important to us as well.

And we have funding to do further work on this as part of our
NFSv4 effort.

More information about the krbdev mailing list