our SPNEGO direction
kwc at citi.umich.edu
Wed Nov 13 12:36:01 EST 2002
> > Well, that's why I did evaluate the umich patch. But unless someone
> > is willing to write code and give it to MIT under a license MIT will
> > accept, then wanting mechglue is very likely to continue to be a
> > nothing more than a desire.
> > If someone has serious time or money to dedicate to this project we'd
> > be happy to discuss design and some of our portability concerns. I do
> > believe it is not particularly difficult to do the mechglue layer; I
> > simply don't have time and don't ex pect MIT to have time in the
> > future.
> We should talk more about what we currently have, and what
> you'd like to see in order for it to be accepted back. My
> current priority is to get the RPC code into an acceptable
> state, but the mechglue code is important to us as well.
And we have funding to do further work on this as part of our
More information about the krbdev