another public api question
jaltman at columbia.edu
Tue Apr 16 15:57:01 EDT 2002
> I think we've actually gotten a fairly consistent internal position on
> that. We've decided that the interface you proposed, and committed is
> a reasonable compromise and that the app_defaults stuff is fine, but
> the raw profile interface is not something we want to expose.
I'm not sure I understand entirely what this implies. Does this mean
that the separate profile libraries are going to be removed? For
example, XPPROF32.DLL ?
Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 1.1.21 available now!!!
The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH plus Telnet, FTP and HTTP
http://www.kermit-project.org/ secured with Kerberos, SRP, and
kermit-support at columbia.edu OpenSSL.
More information about the krbdev