Updated NAT fixes

Nicolas Williams Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com
Thu Apr 11 17:27:00 EDT 2002

Is it fair to say that between sequence numbers, sub-keys, replay
caching for AP messages and directional host address there is no need
for replay caching of priv/safe/cred messages?


On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 04:32:20PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hmm.  I don't think applications actually tend to use that feature
> much.  Also, it's not required by the protocol spec, especially if
> using sequence numbers.  There's discussion within the IETF of adding
> a direction address type for the next version of the protocol and
> removing addresses completely from priv and safe for the following
> version.
-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-

Visit our website at http://www.ubswarburg.com

This message contains confidential information and is intended only 
for the individual named.  If you are not the named addressee you 
should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.  Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this 
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free 
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, 
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore 
does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents 
of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  If 
verification is required please request a hard-copy version.  This 
message is provided for informational purposes and should not be 
construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or 
related financial instruments.

More information about the krbdev mailing list