[krbdev.mit.edu #8650] git commit
Greg Hudson via RT
rt-comment at KRBDEV-PROD-APP-1.mit.edu
Thu Mar 15 00:13:49 EDT 2018
Exit with status 0 from kadmind
Typically, 0 denotes successful exit. In particular, init systems
will complain if another different value is returned. This presents a
problem for automated installation jobs which want to restart kadmind.
`service kadmin stop` typically sends SIGTERM, which is caught by
verto and passed to our handler. Besides cleanup, we then call
verto_break(), which causes the verto_run() event loop to return. The
weird return code has been present since the addition of the kadmin
code, which used a similar event model for signals.
https://github.com/krb5/krb5/commit/3e53f7b254c6704ad16942f98d9b222c9e069ef3
Author: Robbie Harwood <rharwood at redhat.com>
Committer: Greg Hudson <ghudson at mit.edu>
Commit: 3e53f7b254c6704ad16942f98d9b222c9e069ef3
Branch: master
src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
More information about the krb5-bugs
mailing list