[krbdev.mit.edu #8424] New failure in t_sn2princ.py

[Shawn Emery via RT]

On 05/28/16 06:43 PM, Greg Hudson via RT wrote:
> What version is this?  As far as I can tell, t_sn2princ.py has always
> checked the reverse resolution results before running the test, so it
> should skip the test rather than failing.
>
> (The PTR change is intentional.  https://github.com/krb5/krb5/pull/457
> revises the test to be less specific about the reverse resolution result,
> but it should not be required for the test script to succeed.)

Regarding not skipping the test case: yes, this module is patched in our 
distribution and was not skipping the reverse lookup test in this 
instance.  However we would still like to have test coverage for reverse 
resolution.

In regards to  test case failure: yes, the above pull request does 
resolve test failure.  I've must of searched for issues in this test 
module hours before the pull request was submitted.

Thanks,

Shawn.
--