[krbdev.mit.edu #7604] Dynamically expand timeout when TCP connects
Greg Hudson via RT
rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Fri May 30 12:10:15 EDT 2014
I don't think this implementation takes effect when the TCP connect
returns 0 immediately (as opposed to EINPROGRESS). Probably not
important, but I'm noting it here for the record. If we switch to a
rule-based implementation of sendto_kdc as suggested in
http://k5wiki.kerberos.org/wiki/Projects/Rule_based_sendto_kdc_loop this
would be pretty easy to fix.
More information about the krb5-bugs
mailing list