[krbdev.mit.edu #6835] Re: accept_sec_context RFC4121 support bug in 1.8.3

[Tom Yu via RT]

"Derrick Brashear via RT" <rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu> writes:

> Ah. You may disregard this, though the code should perhaps be
> commented. RFC 4757 in defining rc4-hmac-exp explicitly
> codifies the old token format, while not referring to RFC 4121.

What should the comment say?  Should it mention that RFC 4121
accidentally omitted rc4-hmac-exp from the list of "not-newer"?

I think there would need to be comments both in accept_sec_context.c
and util_crypt.c, because some of the RFC 4121 vs RFC 1964 selection
logic moved to util_crypt.c.