[krbdev.mit.edu #6570] PATCH: Fix symbol collision between krb5 1.7 and uClibc

[Tom Yu via RT]

"\"\" W.Michael Petullo \" via RT\"" <rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu>
writes:

> I have attached a patch against krb5 1.7 that fixes a symbol collision  
> between krb5 and uClibc. This allows one to compile krb5 against uClibc.

Thanks.  Why is there a definition of ruserpass() in uClibc?  It looks
useful only to the ftp client.  Should we use a system-provided copy
of ruserpass() if available?  We might perform the function renaming
as an interim solution if we are going to attempt to use the system
version of the function.