[krbdev.mit.edu #5429] SVN Commit
Ezra Peisach via RT
rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Mon Feb 5 17:12:18 EST 2007
Sam Hartman via RT wrote:
> (the keytab interface.
> It should not have had a keyblock structure directly)
>
>
Yes - but unfortunately - it does.... I don't see a way around it...
The krb5_keytab_entry
has it and we are stuck with it... Heimdal has the same structure...
So given that I should not use krb5_copy_keyblock_contents - the only
other solution is to
do what is in the other keytab handlers - malloc my own keytab contents
memory... - which
is what I thought you were trying to avoid...
So - any solutions?
Ezra
More information about the krb5-bugs
mailing list