[krbdev.mit.edu #5429] SVN Commit

Ezra Peisach via RT rt-comment at krbdev.mit.edu
Mon Feb 5 17:12:18 EST 2007


Sam Hartman via RT wrote:
> (the keytab interface.
> It should not have had a keyblock structure directly)
>
>   
Yes - but unfortunately  - it does....  I don't see a way around it... 
The krb5_keytab_entry
has it and we are stuck with it...  Heimdal has the same structure...

So given that I should not use krb5_copy_keyblock_contents - the only 
other solution is to
do what is in the other keytab handlers - malloc my own keytab contents 
memory... - which
is what I thought you were trying to avoid...

So - any solutions?

Ezra







More information about the krb5-bugs mailing list