[krbdev.mit.edu #3821] krb5-1.5 alpha - should library version numbers be bumped?

[Ken Raeburn via RT]

On Jun 5, 2006, at 19:42, Ezra Peisach via RT wrote:
> I am looking at a redhat system - looks like it is 1.3.4 - so maybe  
> this
> is not an issue..

Well, it still wasn't supposed to change ... when you look at the  
symbols actually declared in the headers.  (Minus those inside the  
"KRB5_PRIVATE" blocks, etc.)

Ken