[krbdev.mit.edu #3036] Feature Request 2a for 1.5 (or whatever)

[Jeffrey Altman via RT]

Please see ticket 3039 which I have generated as a parent to this and
all of the other 2x tickets Hank posted today.   At the current time it
is not feasible for the MIT Kerberos team to be considering the
construction of new ccache implementations beyond the CCAPI
implementation.  ccache implementations really need to be managed by the
OS vendor and the MIT Kerberos team should be working with vendors in
order to integrate well with their implementations.

On the other hand, some sites do have the desire to add new ccache 
functionality which is not supported by the Kerberos libraries.   By
adding a plug-in for ccaches.  Those sites can add the functionality
they need.  The actual implementation of the plug-in could rely on
custom kernel modules or anything else the site desires.