[krbdev.mit.edu #2536] Krb5 Admin Guide fails to document krb524

[Sam Hartman via RT]

>>>>> "\"\"Jeffrey" == \"\"Jeffrey Altman [Kermit Project]\" via RT\" <Jeffrey> writes:


    \"\"Jeffrey> The fact that the default port of 4444 is now being
    \"\"Jeffrey> blocked by ISP's and therefore an alternate port
    \"\"Jeffrey> should be used needs to be added.

I disagree with this.  Adding a warning about the default port and
firewalls seems reasonable, but it's sufficiently widely deployed that
recommending people change their krb524 p,orts is probably ill advised.